What's new

Adachi: Important update, 8Dio threatens reviewers and competing devs

Status
Not open for further replies.
So first of all credit where credit is due - 8dio have respected Corey's private and wished him well. Which is absolutely the right thing to do.
Don't fall for it.

Tawnia recently sent me a PM accusing Cory of "not being a legitimate reviewer" and making outlandish claims about his behavior toward 8Dio, throwing in the usual nonsense about being associated with a competitor, and following it all up with a heaping dose of slimy faux-kindness that attempted to cast doubt on Cory's ability to reliably describe events, thinly veiled as pity for his supposed "problems".
 
Which is not to excuse anything, just to suggest that, maybe the situation isn't totally irredeemable, and that at some point, maybe there's a place for some empathy all round? (Maybe?)
Yes there is. But it requires @Troels Folmann and @tawnia to admit that they bullied Cory and Mario, show empathy and understanding that threatening them with legal action had unnecessary and very real negative impact on their mental well-being, and that they regret and apologize for their actions. It would also be great if they stopped such immature and narcissistic behavior moving forward.

The half-hearted, "I'm sorry you were too sensitive to not get offended" apology that was given is not good enough.

Until they pull their heads out of their asses and do the right thing, pitchforks and torches for everyone.
 
Yes there is. But it requires @Troels Folmann and @tawnia to admit that they bullied Cory and Mario, show empathy and understanding that threatening them with legal action had unnecessary and very real negative impact on their mental well-being, and that they regret and apologize for their actions. It would also be great if they stopped such immature and narcissistic behavior moving forward.

The half-hearted, "I'm sorry you were too sensitive to not get offended" apology that was given is not good enough.

Until they pull their heads out of their asses and do the right thing, pitchforks and torches for everyone.
Well some people don’t have the capacity to feel empathy or sympathy nor can be the “bigger” person. They have a label I will not use here.

In my eyes they should have just been super humble and admit they done wrong things and apologise. Instead all I read from 8dio here is:

1. We give nothing but love back to haters; while also withdrawing adagio legacy (someone wrote)

2. They are competitors to us! Look everyone! ( after I read troels statment on their discord I immediately left both 8dio and soundpaint server, it was clear he was not going to talk about it even though it looked here like he opened a door for a warm and open minded discord community)

3. We have only used laywers 2 times! (I mean, is that something to put on the shelf?

I guess I am also done paying soundpaint and 8dio. Like other stated: I trust Cory every day of the week and I have mad respect for Sarah and Evil(nice)dragon here. I also have had an nothing but amazing contact with Artvista (Hans)
 
Last edited:
Don't fall for it.

Tawnia recently sent me a PM accusing Cory of "not being a legitimate reviewer" and making outlandish claims about his behavior toward 8Dio, throwing in the usual nonsense about being associated with a competitor, and following it all up with a heaping dose of slimy faux-kindness that attempted to cast doubt on Cory's ability to reliably describe events, thinly veiled as pity for his supposed "problems".
Gosh. Cory is possibly the most legit and trustworthy sample library reviewer out there. I trust and respect no one like I trust and respect him. Incredibly counter productive to shit talk the one person literally everyone else likes.
 
So yo ucan only get adagio 2.0? And not 1.6 that is required for Adachi?
If you already had the v1.x versions added to your account, they should still be there. Mine are still listed under legacy downloads down the bottom - but I bought them before the v2 upgrades and then paid for the $8 v2 upgrade that was available if you had the OG Anthology.

However, what is less clear is if you can get v1.x by now buying the v2 Adagio libraries: that seems to have been curtailed if the reports are correct. (And would be a bit silly and counterproductive given that the extra arts in v1.x can still be useful without Adachi. The Adachi instruments make them a bit easier to access to use because you don't have to sort your way through a bunch of separate NKIs.)
 
So the version 1.6 legacy files are sought after because the person made Adachi with them or do they have other qualities that are valuable? Do they sound better?
 
So the version 1.6 legacy files are sought after because the person made Adachi with them or do they have other qualities that are valuable? Do they sound better?
They seem less processed than the new versions, more human, at least in my opinion. Also, there are more presets available
 
So it appears a thread bitching about 8dio, is now resulting in more sales for 8dio and some FOMO sales of Anthology.

There really is no negative press. Any press results in more visibility for the named party.

Lesson learned publicly slamming a company no matter how bad their behavior doesn't lead to the result that people intend.

Not that I'm behind anything that 8dio has alleged to have done, but again, I don't see the point in a virtual public pillory. Especially when the town square doesn't actually exist outside of cyber space.
 
I was going to lock the thread this morning, but with the new Adagio twist to the story, I need to keep it open, if for no other reason than so people know the situation. (For 8dio, file this under "Self-Inflicted Wound.")

Also, please be understanding as I'm deleting a lot of posts (close to a hundred in the last 24 hours), so the thread can stay somewhat clear.

On the topic of Amanda (the attorney), I know her pretty well, and if you'll indulge me, I want to take the opportunity to say she's actually a very cool and ethical person. (As is her husband Hans, of Art Vista.)

Back in the day, she was also counsel for VI-Control. Since Frederick did some sub-contractor work for 8dio, I believe that's how she got hooked up with them. To be clear, with both VI-C and 8dio, these were little side things, not her main job. (Corporate counsel at a major studio.) In fact, in VI-C's case, I think she worked for free, since Frederick didn't have a lot of money.

She does a lot of pro-bono work, and by all accounts is the "good" kind of lawyer. More to the point, she's not the sort who sues people. She represented 8dio for "transactional" work. (Writing contracts and stuff.)

So when Troels (or Tawnia?) were unhappy with Daniel (and others, who I won't name), I assume they told Amanda their side of the story. (Not that I'm an expert at psychology, but I think they both have a tendency towards feeling they're always the victim.) At this stage, lawyers take the client's word that the claims are legit, and don't typically investigate those claims. It's after the recipient responds where they would start the research.

Just my opinion, but I don't think Amanda can be blamed for being in the unlucky position of representing 8dio at the time.

Using the artvista address was possibly an error, but bear in mind, sending letters like this wasn't a typical thing Amanda would do. Amanda is a friendly lawyer, not a shark who sues people, so using that address was probably a cool thing in ordinary circumstances. ("Art Vista? What's that?" "Oh, that's a music software company my husband and I have." "Oh, how cool!")

My feeling is that Amanda has been unfairly vilified in this. Sure, we all (including me) like to take jabs at lawyers, but she was acting in good faith for a company she assumed was giving her the full story. Even in her email to me, it was apparent Amanda was getting a very one-sided version of what's actually been going on. (For legal purposes, I should clarify that T&T's "one-sided versions" aren't necessarily incorrect. It's just that I don't happen to agree with them. This post is my *opinion*.)

In my own post yesterday, I may have been more pointed than I should have been when describing Amanda's email to me, as well as in my email response to her. Nothing she said was out of line, but in a situation like this, where a forum I'm responsible for is hosting a thread very critical of a company, a company known to threaten legal action, I'm going to be a little on edge when I get an email from that company's attorney, even though she's a friend. So I probably over-played the "Don't fuck with me" tone when describing the email. It was a defensive move that portrayed Amanda unfairly, and for that, I'm sorry.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for posting this, Mike. Attorneys can actually bring a lot of value to music businesses and I've worked with a bunch of people who say something along the lines of "Man, I wish I had gone to you earlier, but I had such a negative opinion of attorneys that I wouldn't touch one with a ten foot pole..." We're not all bad!

At this stage, lawyers take the client's word that the claims are legit, and don't typically investigate those claims.
At least in CA, the law somewhat perversely discourages us from figuring out the truth -- certain rules of professional responsibility, like the prohibition on making false statements, only apply if a lawyer knowingly does something. If we don't know what they were saying was untrue, we can't be disciplined for it.

And even when they're being truthful, clients also constantly withhold key information! I recently found myself in the middle of a license renewal negotiation where I was doing my usual "show my client the money!" thing. After about ten minutes of me arguing why they should back a bank truck up to my clients' front door, one of the attorneys on the other side says "David, are you aware that your client owes us [six figures], and is late on repayment?" I was not, and that shut me up pretty fast!

So yeah, there are pros to taking a head-in-the-sand approach (but must be balanced against the potential cost to your reputation if you get dragged into sketchy clients' messes, as looks to be playing out here!), but once you're engaged, a good attorney must give their clients the best quality representation possible. We'll see how much longer Amanda continues to work with 8dio after this thread, though...

And standing offer for anyone who finds themselves on the receiving end of something like this and wants to chat -- I can't/won't offer legal counsel, but I will help point you in the direction of resources and people that can, just drop me a PM.
 
So the version 1.6 legacy files are sought after because the person made Adachi with them or do they have other qualities that are valuable? Do they sound better?
They seem wetter to me. A bit sloppier, IMO. I actually prefer Anthology/Adagio 2.0, but there are a bunch of legatos and articulations in legacy that you can't get in Anthology, so they're definitely worth getting.
 
(3) When repairing relationship ruptures, know which brain to talk to (right or left) and how to talk to it. Many of us operate primarily from the left-brain, thinking that upset feelings can be explained away, when much of the emotional processing is more right brain.
So true. On top of that, when emotions involving intense feelings get involved - i.e. anger, spite, anxiety, etc - our primal brain gets involved. This is the hardest part of the brain to unhook. It's the part of the brain that leads to everything from fights and outbursts, to emotional disorders such as anixety & panic, depression, etc. (As I'm sure you're well aware) this is the oldest part of our brain, a part of our brain we share with all other animals...

All the more reason why it's important to own your mistakes. Especially when being pointed and re-illustrated by multiple examples from different people with simialr stories...
 
Hey everyone! I’m a longtime lurker and very infrequent poster, which means almost no one here knows me. But I feel compelled to share my thoughts here. I do hope you’ll spare a few moments to read them.

I don’t know what in the world this thread has become, but the barren wasteland we are left with is rather embarrassing, if I’m being honest.

So much useful information and insight has been shared on this site! Based on just this thread, though, I can’t help but cringe wondering what a new user would think this place is like.

But we do seem to do a thorough job beating our horses dead!

Up-front I’ll say I know I’m going to get roasted over this post. But it comes from an honest place. So please let my death be honorable, and may the beating avoid my face!

I have watched the videos and read all of the posts as they’ve been shared. I have deep compassion for ANYONE who has ever had to deal with any form of abuse. Particularly at a young age. For a handful of years, I had the pleasure of working with young people in the arts and, as I’m sure many of you know, a whole lot of emotion can come to the surface when you put your heart into your work. And we know that rings true at any age. For some, keeping close to their emotions is the well from which creativity springs. For others, a signed contract is enough to get things kickstarted! 😉

There are a number of people here whose contributions I find invaluable. And some important folks have shared their stories in this thread. While I have no knowledge with which to weigh in on what has been said, I have respect for those who want something positive to come from what they may share.

I don’t know who works for whom or what might be listed on their CVs. It sounds like one might need a bunch of red string and thumbtacks to create a wall map. I don’t have the wall space and, as an avid fan of LOST (yes, we exist… and yes, that was a good ending!), I’ve spent more than enough time figuring out connections. My hope is that if anyone is indeed employed with a competitor of any company, they would use good judgement and have respect for the community when it comes to sharing info on here. It’s hard enough to find reliable voices to trust in the field, to say nothing of the influence some wield when it comes to how schmucks - like me - and regular users make buying decisions. With great power comes… well, y’know.

Context and nuance. Those two words are easy to type but challenging as hell to convey when writing online. Trickier still is making sure we try our best to figure those out when we read stories and comments, be they positive or negative.

I understand the frustration about Adachi. But friends, can we not entirely blame the company that the required version of some libraries are now being made unavailable? Many here complained that the company made money on the back of Adachi. If I was being attacked about profiting on someone’s work that ties-in with already discontinued products, I’d feel that I should stop the thing I’m taking flack over. I doubt we can all say we would disagree.

I am a customer of 8Dio and Soundpaint. And Spitfire. And OT. Annnd… you get the idea. I think many here can say we have invested a great deal of money into our kits. We also want to see good products come to market. Even better when it comes from companies we personally stand behind.

And you know what? I stand behind 8Dio and Soundpaint as companies. I have slowly gotten to know most of the team. Those are real people, musicians, working hard to put out the best products they can in an over-saturated market. I think they take great care of customers and, particularly thanks to Discord, there is almost always someone from the team around to answer a question or resolve an issue. I’ve dealt with a lot of companies about whom I wish I could say the same. I’ve personally not encountered other developers who will see interest in a niche library based on a community discussion, promise to create it, and deliver it a handful of weeks later. Or designers/programmers drop what they are doing to create mock-ups of the UI with a customer’s suggested feature added and then put it on the list for approval.

I also like many of their products. I think Soundpaint uses novel technology to extend and expand the capabilities of our tools to new levels. I am excited to see what comes of their engine now that legato has been added and it is matures into a proper platform.

I stand behind those team members who work hard not because they necessarily need a gig, but because they want to be proud of what they contribute to our world of VSTi libraries and usage of them in the creation of new musical works. If I worked there… well I’d never get hired as that skill set is beyond me. But IF I worked there, I’d be itching to share my experiences to add color to this “discussion.” But anyone who spoke up and identified themselves as working for 8Dio would likely be met with negative comments. Some would see it as unprofessional, even if they are just wanting to share their truth and experiences with the community.

I also stand behind Troels and Tawnia. I realize that after the hundreds of negative posts in this thread, my saying this may seem suspect or like I’m a shill. Believe me when I say I’ve read the comments and carefully considered the situation.

Do I think their responses to the onslaught of negative comments were worded in the best way? Probably not. These are people who own and oversee the development of music sample libraries! These are people who would have had to quite literally bet it all on themselves because they believed in each other and what they could do for the music community. I would expect to see them sharing information about their experiences and where things are now. Which is exactly how the statements read to me.

Neither 8Dio or Soundpaint employs a large staff. A larger company would have probably had a PR rep post on here in response to this thread. Some may have found that better, others not so much. Not having those additional positions presumably allows them to develop things like the Soundpaint software, release it for free, and have the ability to regularly release libraries for the app at prices around $20.

I may be in the minority, but I have more respect for owners who are showing up, interacting, and directly addressing what has been asked of them. That is harder than issuing a blanket statement. I know some expressed frustration that a specific question or two may not have been answered. All due respect, but they are only one party to a conversation. It isn’t hard to see where issues could arise. For example, providing an expanded answer could require disclosure of information THEY can’t divulge because it ties to another company or person not a part of this thread.

I can also imagine how they might also be reticent to share info that could be embarrassing for someone else, perhaps even refusing to do so because of it. I know I have taken that metaphorical bullet a few times. No one else was aware, and it simply looked like my own error. Choices are made based on a lot of factors, some aren’t always things to disclose. Context.

But the main reason I am sharing my truth here is that, based on my experiences, I’ve only seen honest and hard work from T&T. I can’t comment on something from a decade ago. I wasn’t around them.

And while I know we all want to fight for what we think is right, we also all know mistakes can happen in the best and worst of cases. I would have to know ALL aspects of a situation to be able to fairly judge the types of stories I’ve read here. But honestly? I’m a customer: It’s none of my dang business! Even if one of the people involved is the one sharing. There’s no way to really truly know a complete story, particularly any from years ago. And to what end? IF someone had a crap interaction with someone else, does that mean it is representative of them or their work today, the work of their team members, or… working down the line… what may be needed for a project?

Heaven knows I’ve made bad decisions before, and I wouldn’t want anyone to judge me solely from my worst days. And while my understanding of what has been alleged in this thread is that things have been, at best, blown out of proportion in some of the stories shared, I also know that for any bad experience there are dozens or hundreds of happy customers.

Finally, and yes a tangent for a moment; I want to applaud 8Dio for being loud and proud supporters of the LGBTQ community, and working hard to ensure their spaces like Discord remain safe for all users. I have seen comments from the owners on this subject, and some may think it doesn’t need to be mentioned. But it’s still important and not enough effort has really been made by several notable companies. My wife and I are proud allies in title and in action - in our own area of the US - but I am pleased that my money (ok, I have to be fair to the wife: our money!) goes to a company that takes a visible and meaningful stand on- and offline. This area and doing all we can to ensure more women get notable employment throughout the music industry and beyond are crucial to our continued mutual success as a universal community.

So with that massive vowel movement of a comment, I respectfully think we should stop with this circus. There have now been something like 20+ pages which is a whole lot of emotion aimed in one direction. The vast majority of comments now are not from those sharing but from folks picking up stories from others and taking them on as their own battle.

Like or don’t like them. That’s your choice. But let’s stop this back and forth and become civil again. Let’s give the time necessary to clean the blood stains out of the carpet?!

Let’s please not make this resource be Musicians Helping Musicians Destroy Musicians. That will only limit possibilities and opportunities for all of us.

Humbly,

Charlie
 
A larger company would have probably had a PR rep post on here in response to this thread.
It's funny you say that, because honestly your whole post reads like you work for a PR firm and 8DIO asked you to write all of this.

Let’s please not make this resource be Musicians Helping Musicians Destroy Musicians.
Sorry, but I can't understand how you can say this and simultaneously support a company that is exactly doing that. They don't pay musicians their fair share, they don't respect their contributions to their libraries, they bully and threaten them when they say critical things or if they produce competing products. It doesn't get more destructive than that.
 
It's funny you say that, because honestly your whole post reads like you work for a PR firm and 8DIO asked you to write all of this.


Sorry, but I can't understand how you can say this and simultaneously support a company that is exactly doing that. They don't pay musicians their fair share, they don't respect their contributions to their libraries, they bully and threaten them when they say critical things or if they produce competing products. It doesn't get more destructive than that.
I hope a PR firm would write something more succinctly than I did! I’ve just been watching this unfold for days and reached a point where it frustrated me enough to share my thoughts on the situation and what I hope is ultimately the reason we use this site.

I don’t think I could make an educated response on the rest of what you said without knowing the business practices of other developers. I’m sure there are some companies that go beyond what they “need” to do, but I have no idea what the average guys out there actually do.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom