What's new

I've just finished building a new "boring" Windows DAW (2023)

I'm just documenting this, in case it's of interest to anyone here, who might have similar priorities to mine. It's not by any means the best system - but it's not exactly entry level either. (Why not a Mac? That's in the p.s. section at the bottom.)

I wanted to get to a reasonably high performance system for a middle of the road price, that doesn't take too much fiddling with low level settings (like CPU affinity) and hopefully also avoid software makers saying "it's not supported". ;)

The resulting, more specific goals for this build became:
  • Avoid asymmetrical CPU architectures, since most software doesn't really deal with those intelligently yet.
    • that eliminated the newer Intel i5, i7 and i9 and some of the high end Ryzens with 3D cache
  • Get to pretty fast single core speed, since I see myself migrating to ever more modelled instruments and fx
    • that eliminates a lot of workstation CPUs (which also tend to become more expensive builds all around)
    • that led me to the second from the top Ryzen - also because it was quite a price jump to the top end
  • Get to a decent core count
    • that got me to a Ryzen 9 series
  • Have generous number of m2 slots (so I can keep using my older NVMe SSDs)
    • that led me to X670 based motherboards
  • Have decent upgrade potential
    • that also led me to the new Ryzen AM5 socket based systems rather than the prior (less expensive) generation, since this would facilitate a potential CPU upgrade sometime later, while keeping the rest of the system intact
  • Try to get to low latency as best as possible
    • According to AMD, the sweet spot for the new Ryzen CPU's is 6000MHz RAM, so I got that with CL32 latency, which was the lowest I could easily get.
    • Also to get to higher RAM clock speeds, one has to stick with just 2 RAM slots for now, so 2x32GB sticks was the best currently feasible configuration. Since I don't run large orchestral projects, 64GB should serve me well for quite a while.
  • Have a reasonably silent system
Ended up with:
  • CPU: Ryzen 7900x: 12 cores, 24 threads 4.7/5.5 GHz
  • Motherboard: ASUS Prime X670E-PRO WIFI with 4 m2 slots
  • RAM: Trident Z5 64GB DDR5 6000MHz CL32 Dual Channel Kit (2x 32GB)
  • Storage: 3 NVMe SSDs, and 2 traditional hard disks: one 18TB drive for internal backups, and another 2 TB drive for keeping installation programs and other "spare" stuff, that's rarely used.
  • Case: Ended up going with a high air-flow case this time around. The idea is to keep fan speeds very low because of the superior air flow rather than having a really boxed in and sound proofed ("silent") case where the fans have to do more work to move air past the hot items. -- This strategy may or may not work out, but would be relatively easy to overcome later.
  • Video: For now I'm just using the integrated video from the CPU, since that's plenty for DAW use. So a separate video card may or may not end up in that system - I'm just not sure yet.
I haven't done any overclocking other than the kind of stuff that comes as easy configuration within the BIOS, like using the faster RAM at it's full rated speed. Maybe a bit more overclocking later, maybe never.


p.s. I'm using the Apple ecosystem (MacOS, iOS) for my daily personal computing and had considered going MacOS for my music computer as well, but ended up deciding against that for the time being, because:
  • My music computer continues to address my desire for fiddling and tweaking to a degree, while still having access to a very wide and well supported ecosystem (Linux is still a much more tricky platform for music making)
  • In music I still enjoy the use of older hardware and software, and that's simply easier with Windows
  • On a very subjective personal level, I very much enjoy being multi-platform, using MacOS, Windows and Linux for different parts of my computing life. Not being stuck in one world has been a meaningful part of my self-definition pretty much all of my adult life. But I wouldn't recommend it for most individuals, since it's difficult enough to become good at using one eco-system. -- There's also the (old man shaking fists at clouds) bonus: I get to complain about the shortcomings of every computing platform! :)
p.p.s. I'm using Linux for my server needs and some IoT fiddling, so I get my Linux kicks that way.
Total price ?
 
Why "boring"?

wanted to get to
  • a relatively high performance system
  • for a medium price,
  • stay highly backward compatible,
  • avoid too much fiddling with low level settings (like CPU affinity),
  • keep most of it for 5-10 years, and
  • hopefully avoid "non-supported" status by most software makers.
And just in case, someone else here has similar high level priorities, and would like a high level starting point, this is an attempt to document my thinking process and what I ended up with.

The resulting, more specific technical goals for this build became:
  • Avoid asymmetrical CPU architectures, since most software doesn't really deal with those intelligently yet.
    • that eliminated the newer Intel i5, i7 and i9 and some of the high end Ryzens with 3D cache
  • Get to pretty fast single core speed, since I see myself migrating to ever more modelled instruments and fx
    • that eliminates a lot of workstation CPUs (which also tend to become more expensive builds all around)
    • that led me to the second from the top Ryzen - also because it was quite a price jump to the top end
  • Get to a decent core count, so multi-core optimized software can spread out.
    • that got me to a Ryzen 9 series
  • Have generous number of m2 slots (so I can keep using my older NVMe SSDs)
    • that led me to X670E based motherboards, since they have more of m2 slots than some of the less expensive motherboards.
  • Have decent upgrade potential
    • that also led me to the new Ryzen AM5 socket based systems rather than the prior (less expensive) generation, since this would facilitate a potential CPU upgrade sometime later, while keeping the rest of the system intact.
  • Try to get to low latency as best as possible
    • According to AMD, the sweet spot for the new Ryzen CPU's is 6000MHz RAM, so I got that with CL32 latency, which was the lowest I could easily get.
    • Also to get to good RAM clock speeds, one has to stay with just 2 RAM slots for now, even while the motherboard may allow for more - so 2x32GB sticks was the best currently feasible configuration. Since I don't run large orchestral projects, 64GB should serve me well for quite a while.
  • Have a reasonably silent system
    • that was one of the motivating factors to over-provide on the power supply and also go pretty big on air cooling. Big power supply means it doesn't have to use its fans most of the time. Big air cooler means, its fans can spin more slowly.
  • Try to stay on Windows 10 for the near term, just to stay in the environment that's still the most well tested and debugged by software makers in general.
Ended up with:
  • CPU: Ryzen 7900x: 12 cores, 24 threads 4.7/5.5 GHz
  • Motherboard: ASUS Prime X670E-PRO WIFI with 4 m2 slots
  • RAM: Trident Z5 64GB DDR5 6000MHz CL32 Dual Channel Kit (2x 32GB)
  • Storage: 3 NVMe SSDs, and 2 traditional hard disks: one 18TB drive for internal backups, and another 2 TB drive for keeping installation programs and other "spare" stuff, that's rarely used.
  • Case: Ended up going with a high air-flow case this time around. The idea is to keep fan speeds very low because of the superior air flow rather than having a really boxed in and sound proofed ("silent") case where the fans have to do more work to move air past the hot items. -- This strategy may or may not work out, but would be relatively easy to overcome later.
  • Power Supply: CorsairRMe Series 1000W 80+ Gold, Low-Noise, Dual EPS12V Full Modular
  • CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 (it's tight, but just fits for the chosen case)
  • Video: For now I'm just using the integrated video from the CPU, since that's plenty for DAW use. So a separate video card may or may not end up in that system - I'm just not sure yet.
  • And, as I had hoped, so far that system appears to be working well with Windows 10 Pro. I can now take my time to go beyond Windows 10 at some time in the future.
    • Maybe I'll skip 11 entirely, if there's a 12 before the support for 10 ends and assuming 11 doesn't add highly desirable features and/or performance benefits. Historically I've skipped every second Windows version - going from XP to 7 to 10.
I haven't done any overclocking other than the kind of stuff that comes as easy configuration within the BIOS, like using the faster RAM at it's full rated speed. I've typically preferred overclockable CPUs, even while I'm not really into the overclocking game. That's because those CPU's tend to be made from the higher quality batches of wavers (chip binning)


p.s. I'm using the Apple ecosystem (MacOS, iOS) for my daily personal computing and had considered going MacOS for my music computer as well, but ended up deciding against that for the time being, because:
  • My music computer continues to address my desire for fiddling and tweaking to a degree, while still having access to a very wide and well supported ecosystem (Linux is still a much more tricky platform for music making)
  • In music I still enjoy the use of older hardware and software, and that's simply easier with Windows
  • On a very subjective personal level, I very much enjoy being multi-platform, using MacOS, Windows and Linux for different parts of my computing life. Not being stuck in one world has been meaningful to my self-definition pretty much all of my adult life. But I wouldn't recommend it for most individuals, since it's difficult enough to become good at using one eco-system. -- There's also the (old man shaking fists at clouds) bonus: I get to complain about the shortcomings of every computing platform! :)
p.p.s. I'm using Linux for my server needs and some IoT fiddling, so I get my Linux kicks that way.
Thanks very much for posting not just your detailed specs, but the underlying motivations as well!

  • Case: Ended up going with a high air-flow case this time around. The idea is to keep fan speeds very low because of the superior air flow rather than having a really boxed in and sound proofed ("silent") case where the fans have to do more work to move air past the hot items. -- This strategy may or may not work out, but would be relatively easy to overcome later.
So, how is the system performing noise-wise, especially during heavy CPU processing?
 
Why "boring"?

wanted to get to
  • a relatively high performance system
  • for a medium price,
  • stay highly backward compatible,
  • avoid too much fiddling with low level settings (like CPU affinity),
  • keep most of it for 5-10 years, and
  • hopefully avoid "non-supported" status by most software makers.
And just in case, someone else here has similar high level priorities, and would like a high level starting point, this is an attempt to document my thinking process and what I ended up with.

The resulting, more specific technical goals for this build became:
  • Avoid asymmetrical CPU architectures, since most software doesn't really deal with those intelligently yet.
    • that eliminated the newer Intel i5, i7 and i9 and some of the high end Ryzens with 3D cache
  • Get to pretty fast single core speed, since I see myself migrating to ever more modelled instruments and fx
    • that eliminates a lot of workstation CPUs (which also tend to become more expensive builds all around)
    • that led me to the second from the top Ryzen - also because it was quite a price jump to the top end
  • Get to a decent core count, so multi-core optimized software can spread out.
    • that got me to a Ryzen 9 series
  • Have generous number of m2 slots (so I can keep using my older NVMe SSDs)
    • that led me to X670E based motherboards, since they have more of m2 slots than some of the less expensive motherboards.
  • Have decent upgrade potential
    • that also led me to the new Ryzen AM5 socket based systems rather than the prior (less expensive) generation, since this would facilitate a potential CPU upgrade sometime later, while keeping the rest of the system intact.
  • Try to get to low latency as best as possible
    • According to AMD, the sweet spot for the new Ryzen CPU's is 6000MHz RAM, so I got that with CL32 latency, which was the lowest I could easily get.
    • Also to get to good RAM clock speeds, one has to stay with just 2 RAM slots for now, even while the motherboard may allow for more - so 2x32GB sticks was the best currently feasible configuration. Since I don't run large orchestral projects, 64GB should serve me well for quite a while.
  • Have a reasonably silent system
    • that was one of the motivating factors to over-provide on the power supply and also go pretty big on air cooling. Big power supply means it doesn't have to use its fans most of the time. Big air cooler means, its fans can spin more slowly.
  • Try to stay on Windows 10 for the near term, just to stay in the environment that's still the most well tested and debugged by software makers in general.
Ended up with:
  • CPU: Ryzen 7900x: 12 cores, 24 threads 4.7/5.5 GHz
  • Motherboard: ASUS Prime X670E-PRO WIFI with 4 m2 slots
  • RAM: Trident Z5 64GB DDR5 6000MHz CL32 Dual Channel Kit (2x 32GB)
  • Storage: 3 NVMe SSDs, and 2 traditional hard disks: one 18TB drive for internal backups, and another 2 TB drive for keeping installation programs and other "spare" stuff, that's rarely used.
  • Case: Ended up going with a high air-flow case this time around. The idea is to keep fan speeds very low because of the superior air flow rather than having a really boxed in and sound proofed ("silent") case where the fans have to do more work to move air past the hot items. -- This strategy may or may not work out, but would be relatively easy to overcome later.
  • Power Supply: CorsairRMe Series 1000W 80+ Gold, Low-Noise, Dual EPS12V Full Modular
  • CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 (it's tight, but just fits for the chosen case)
  • Video: For now I'm just using the integrated video from the CPU, since that's plenty for DAW use. So a separate video card may or may not end up in that system - I'm just not sure yet.
  • And, as I had hoped, so far that system appears to be working well with Windows 10 Pro. I can now take my time to go beyond Windows 10 at some time in the future.
    • Maybe I'll skip 11 entirely, if there's a 12 before the support for 10 ends and assuming 11 doesn't add highly desirable features and/or performance benefits. Historically I've skipped every second Windows version - going from XP to 7 to 10.
I haven't done any overclocking other than the kind of stuff that comes as easy configuration within the BIOS, like using the faster RAM at it's full rated speed. I've typically preferred overclockable CPUs, even while I'm not really into the overclocking game. That's because those CPU's tend to be made from the higher quality batches of wavers (chip binning)


p.s. I'm using the Apple ecosystem (MacOS, iOS) for my daily personal computing and had considered going MacOS for my music computer as well, but ended up deciding against that for the time being, because:
  • My music computer continues to address my desire for fiddling and tweaking to a degree, while still having access to a very wide and well supported ecosystem (Linux is still a much more tricky platform for music making)
  • In music I still enjoy the use of older hardware and software, and that's simply easier with Windows
  • On a very subjective personal level, I very much enjoy being multi-platform, using MacOS, Windows and Linux for different parts of my computing life. Not being stuck in one world has been meaningful to my self-definition pretty much all of my adult life. But I wouldn't recommend it for most individuals, since it's difficult enough to become good at using one eco-system. -- There's also the (old man shaking fists at clouds) bonus: I get to complain about the shortcomings of every computing platform! :)
p.p.s. I'm using Linux for my server needs and some IoT fiddling, so I get my Linux kicks that way.
So glad you posted this, when I did my long hairy dissertation on what I chose, mine was of course Intel-based and I had hoped (and I think mentioned) that anyone with new AMD specs, please post... and here you are! The explanations are VERY helpful, I know zero about AMD architecture so I couldn't comment on the comparisons. Great post!
 
  • Case: Ended up going with a high air-flow case this time around. The idea is to keep fan speeds very low because of the superior air flow rather than having a really boxed in and sound proofed ("silent") case where the fans have to do more work to move air past the hot items. -- This strategy may or may not work out, but would be relatively easy to overcome later.
Thank you for this post. This is perfect for my situation, because I also want to build a new Win PC and dont want it to be the most expensive one, but still be able to use it for some time and maybe upgrade in the future.

I would like to know which case did you buy. Can you add the brand/model? that woul help me so much, as I really have no idea wht to look for :)
 
I would like to know which case did you buy. Can you add the brand/model? that woul help me so much, as I really have no idea wht to look for :)
I ended up with a Corsair 4000D AIRFLOW Tempered Glass Mid-Tower ATX Case — Black

However, the case is the most arguable component of my build for the following reasons:
  • I maximized for airflow, rather than silence
    • upsides
      • under normal use the fans spin very slowly and therefore rather quietly
      • it's about as small as you can go for a midsize case
    • downsides
      • when going full tilt, it's probably louder than a more rigorously enclosed case with a bit of padding on the inside (typically marketed as "quiet" or "silent" cases
      • the very effective, large air cooler fits, but the second fan is a rather tight fit, because it needed to be mounted a little higher than the first fan, to allow enough space for the memory modules. I was able to just make it work - but then took an alternative approach: I swapped the tight fitting large CPU cooler fan with one of the slightly smaller case fans and that made the fit a lot more comfortable.
But at the same time, I feel like the case is the least strategic component - because swapping cases is a bit of work - but requires zero software re-installations & activations, BIOS config or any of that kind of pain-in-the-neck work.

In my DAW use, the fans haven't troubled me yet because the new CPU is still very bored ;) with the loads I've thrown at it so far.

But maybe also because my ears (along with the rest of me) are too old to be sensitive to high frequencies and I hardly work with mics in my studio anymore. Even the occasional guitar tube amp recording goes through speaker simulations. And more recently I've even been happy enough with software guitar amps.

For an easier fit for large fans, I believe Corsair also has a very similar, but a little wider case. But it also costs quite a bit more where I live.

Or for a less airflow and more sound-proofed case, search for the terms "silent" or "quiet" in the case name.
 
Why "boring"?

wanted to get to
  • a relatively high performance system
  • for a medium price,
  • stay highly backward compatible,
  • avoid too much fiddling with low level settings (like CPU affinity),
  • keep most of it for 5-10 years, and
  • hopefully avoid "non-supported" status by most software makers.
And just in case, someone else here has similar high level priorities, and would like a high level starting point, this is an attempt to document my thinking process and what I ended up with.

The resulting, more specific technical goals for this build became:
  • Avoid asymmetrical CPU architectures, since most software doesn't really deal with those intelligently yet.
    • that eliminated the newer Intel i5, i7 and i9 and some of the high end Ryzens with 3D cache
  • Get to pretty fast single core speed, since I see myself migrating to ever more modelled instruments and fx
    • that eliminates a lot of workstation CPUs (which also tend to become more expensive builds all around)
    • that led me to the second from the top Ryzen - also because it was quite a price jump to the top end
  • Get to a decent core count, so multi-core optimized software can spread out.
    • that got me to a Ryzen 9 series
  • Have generous number of m.2 slots (so I can keep using my older NVMe SSDs)
    • that led me to X670E based motherboards, since they have more of m2 slots than some of the less expensive motherboards.
  • Have decent upgrade potential
    • that also led me to the new Ryzen AM5 socket based systems rather than the prior (less expensive) generation, since this would facilitate a potential CPU upgrade sometime later, while keeping the rest of the system intact.
  • Try to get to low latency as best as possible
    • According to AMD, the sweet spot for the new Ryzen CPU's is 6000MHz RAM, so I got that with CL32 latency, which was the lowest I could easily get.
    • Also to get to good RAM clock speeds, one has to stay with just 2 RAM slots for now, even while the motherboard may allow for more - so 2x32GB sticks was the best currently feasible configuration. Since I don't run large orchestral projects, 64GB should serve me well for quite a while.
  • Have a reasonably silent system
    • that was one of the motivating factors to over-provide on the power supply and also go pretty big on air cooling. Big power supply means it doesn't have to use its fans most of the time. Big air cooler means, its fans can spin more slowly.
  • Try to stay on Windows 10 for the near term, just to stay in the environment that's still the most well tested and debugged by software makers in general.
Ended up with:
  • CPU: Ryzen 7900x: 12 cores, 24 threads 4.7/5.5 GHz
  • Motherboard: ASUS Prime X670E-PRO WIFI with 4 m.2 slots
  • RAM: Trident Z5 64GB DDR5 6000MHz CL32 Dual Channel Kit (2x 32GB)
  • Storage: 3 NVMe SSDs, and 2 traditional hard disks: one 18TB drive for internal backups, and another 2 TB drive for keeping installation programs and other "spare" stuff, that's rarely used.
  • Case: Ended up going with a high air-flow case this time around, specifically the Corsair 4000D Airflow ATX Computer Case. The idea is to keep fan speeds very low because of the superior air flow rather than having a really boxed in and sound proofed (often called "silent" or "quiet") case where the fans have to do more work to move air past the hot items. -- This strategy may or may not work out, but would be relatively easy to overcome later.
  • Power Supply: CorsairRMe Series 1000W 80+ Gold, Low-Noise, Dual EPS12V Full Modular
  • CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 (it's tight, but just fits for the chosen case)
  • Video: For now I'm just using the integrated video from the CPU, since that's plenty for DAW use. So a separate video card may or may not end up in that system - I'm just not sure yet.
  • And, as I had hoped, so far that system appears to be working well with Windows 10 Pro. I can now take my time to go beyond Windows 10 at some time in the future.
    • Maybe I'll skip 11 entirely, if there's a 12 before the support for 10 ends and assuming 11 doesn't add highly desirable features and/or performance benefits. Historically I've skipped every second Windows version - going from XP to 7 to 10.
I haven't done any overclocking other than the kind of stuff that comes as easy configuration within the BIOS, like using the faster RAM at it's full rated speed. I've typically preferred overclockable CPUs, even while I'm not really into the overclocking game. That's because those CPU's tend to be made from the higher quality batches of wavers (chip binning)


p.s. I'm using the Apple ecosystem (MacOS, iOS) for my daily personal computing and had considered going MacOS for my music computer as well, but ended up deciding against that for the time being, because:
  • My music computer continues to address my desire for fiddling and tweaking to a degree, while still having access to a very wide and well supported ecosystem (Linux is still a much more tricky platform for music making)
  • In music I still enjoy the use of older hardware and software, and that's simply easier with Windows
  • On a very subjective personal level, I very much enjoy being multi-platform, using MacOS, Windows and Linux for different parts of my computing life. Not being stuck in one world has been meaningful to my self-definition pretty much all of my adult life. But I wouldn't recommend it for most individuals, since it's difficult enough to become good at using one eco-system. -- There's also the (old man shaking fists at clouds) bonus: I get to complain about the shortcomings of every computing platform! :)
p.p.s. I'm using Linux for my server needs and some IoT fiddling, so I get my Linux kicks that way.
With such a high end system, I would have gone for 128 GB RAM.
 
With such a high end system, I would have gone for 128 GB RAM.
You are free to do so - I wouldn't want to talk you out of it. :)

I chose not to do so, because as I outlined in my original post:

Also to get to good RAM clock speeds, one has to stay with just 2 RAM slots for now, even while the motherboard may allow for more - so 2x32GB sticks was the best currently feasible configuration. Since I don't run large orchestral projects, 64GB should serve me well for quite a while.
 
Top Bottom