Steve Hicks
Active Member
I imagine some of it is that this is suuuuuper slow and consequently even harder to mock in samples. I did try to get some movement into the long notes of CSS - CC11, 11 and 2 - but it's hard!This is nice. I quite like the tone of AR1V1 on the tune. Again, it shows off the lovely soft dynamic layers of the library. But for whatever reason the rendition doesn't sound quite as cohesive to me as your version of the Mahler 6 Andante moderato you did with a similar layout. I can't quite put my finger on why. I don't think it's the presence of the harp. Maybe it's just the length of some of the accompanying sustains in this piece, which sometimes sound a bit more static than I'd like.
Any differences in processing, mics, or reverb between the two?
There was a little eq and tail on it - so here is clean
View attachment mahler 5 slow new.mp3