What's new

Developers - Please Help Settle This Debate

I agree that it would be pointless for library developers to stop this.

More often than not, ownership of content is extremely complicated. It's seldom a case of a musician using a sample library they own on a song they've written, recorded and fully own. At one time, I think EW tried to do this, but those were the very early days of this biz.
 
Your disagreement is about the devotion to EULA and the assumption that it's normal. Nobody cares for all the reasons you've read and experienced
A EULA is all about copyright, and musicians tend to care deeply about copyright.

You will find if you search through the threads on this site that many forum members are concerned about doing things by the book. Even when they know that there will be no practical repercussion if they decide to break the rules. Just as a musician wants their work respected so do the creators of virtual instruments and plugins, and most people here seem to like to treat people how they wish to be treated themselves (at least publicly).
 
As long as you use the library by yourselves and only one/two computers at a period of time, I believe it's legal, period.

Hypothetically, I can have a client who has very low knowledge about composition (in which I will create a composition or whatever midi files) or a client who are very deep knowledge about composition, who gives feedback/review, some parts of composition or initial midi files to render the sound, so he/she can concentrates on other parts that he/she very strong at. is it forbidden to do this?.... I don't think so, If it is forbidden, the EULA or whatever contractual agreement will also say about what types of clients you can take. I never see this kind of EULA.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom