Phillip996
New Member
I just wish it had phrases. The textures are beautiful however. Just what I would expect of a Whitacre library
Meh. 4 1/2 hours later it's not even at 25%. Still crawling along at 22Mbps. I paused and ran a separate download test and got 768Mbps, so it's not the fault of the line. Is anyone else seeing better speeds?
I don't know whether they need to recode the app for multithreaded downloads (like Continuata) or just get a better hosting provider, but this is pathetic given the huge size of the libraries!
Bet the others you and I have got aren’t recorded in Air Lyndhurst though. Throw this with your HZS and SSO and you’ve got the closest anyone’s ever going to have to the real sounding deal...Sorry I dont want to disturb the party, but what exactly for should I need another Ah/Ooh/Oh/MMM choir? I haven't heard yet anthing that outstanding
On the other Hand I wonder how different a that much more powerful like Hollywood Choir was received here and evoked here so much negative excitement.
Sorry but for me there are already great Choirs with and without any Wording available. (VSL has at least different consonants in addition to Ah and Uh and is excellent in its sound).
In short, I simply do not understand what Spitfires Choir-swells shall have that much outstanding.
I’m so glad they steered away from the word builder headache. Would have been a nightmare for them and us. Quality over Quantity is way more important in my book.I don't either.
Word Builder impresses me as an innovation; but after struggling with it for 15 cues back when EWQLSC was released, I ultimately decided that—for me, at least—it was more trouble than it was worth. I realize the feature has improved a bit in more recent libraries; but I don't believe it's become a breeze to use, even now.
Of course, YMMV.
Best,
Geoff
Hey sorry if I messed that up...just happened to see the website page was up and wanted to share ASAP.I've been away so maybe I missed something but why wasn't this posted in the commercial forum?
Shorts are included in the listed arts at the bottom of the product pagei have only one question: no shorts at all? Missed them on the specs.. or am i blind?
I don't believe we're supposed to start threads in the Commercial forum. If so, you did the right thing by starting it here.Hey sorry if I messed that up...just happened to see the website page was up and wanted to share ASAP.
I'm in Seattle - most of my clients are big tech companies. I do video production, so my internet traffic averages 2-3TB a month, much of which is to/from companies also using AWS, but the only developer I have these glacial speeds with is Spitfire. I have no idea why. With a decent hosting provider this library should take around 30 mins to download, but it's actually looking like it's going to be >20 hours.Could depend on your location! I believe Spitfire uses Amazon servers to distribute libraries, so you're not downloading directly from Spitfire. You'd be downloading from a distributed server much closer to your geographical location, and that specific one you're connected to could be the bottleneck.
EDITED: Yup, Spitfire uses Amazon's Cloudfront. Maybe an issue with your local Cloudfront connection/server?
It certainly seems clear that Spitfire has decided to reduce—but not eliminate—its involvement here, while at the same time increasing its presence at YouTube.My guess is that Spitfire has changed their engagement strategy vis-a-vis vi-control after experiencing what they saw as unfair and ill-informed criticism of some recent releases and marketing techniques (announcements of announcements, flashing banners, etc.).
Happened around the same time Paul started his informative YouTube channel and Spitfire upped their output of educational videos. Again, my guess is that this is part of an effort to shift the community discussion to youtube as well as to help people get more out of the libraries and clear up some FUD.
Also, just guessing, but it reduces the temptation to try to defend your product from attack if there's no official thread that you are invested in and which feels like needs protecting. Not only does no one win in those back and forths, it has the effect of putting your critics on the same playing field as you, regardless of anyone's actual credentials.
I agree, and I'd like to add that's a gracious thing to say about a competing developer.What a silly comment that undermines a fantastic library from Spitfire. Nice to see something targets a particular sound and capability and nails it as far as I can tell. Obviously it is very different from what I did.
It certainly seems clear that Spitfire has decided to reduce—but not eliminate—its involvement here, while at the same time increasing its presence at YouTube.
Best,
Geoff
I'm in Seattle - most of my clients are big tech companies. I do video production, so my internet traffic averages 2-3TB a month, much of which is to/from companies also using AWS, but the only developer I have these glacial speeds with is Spitfire. I have no idea why. With a decent hosting provider this library should take around 30 mins to download, but it's actually looking like it's going to be >20 hours.
As Spitfire posted in this thread just earlier today, I wouldn't go as far as to describe the situation as a "loss of Spitfire Audio here;" but I share your sentiment, sostenuto, that it would be great if they would ramp up their involvement at VI Control again.IMHO, this would be a shame, as well as push me further toward paying more attention to alternate sources. This is a very active and open Forum, which provides a steady flow of worldwide opinions and perspectives. YT is terrific for what is does well, but loss of Spitfire Audio here seems a large, net loss for SF.
Agree … was quite surprised to see initial post not made by SFA on COMMERCIAL Announcements.
Well, I'm glad I checked in today and visited THIS forum!It certainly seems clear that Spitfire has decided to reduce—but not eliminate—its involvement here, while at the same time increasing its presence at YouTube.
Best,
Geoff
I'm seeing the same kind of speeds here in Portland. I've paused it and restarted, and seen it rise up to 50Mbps, but when I went back, it was back to 20-22ish. Ugh!!!Meh. 4 1/2 hours later it's not even at 25%. Still crawling along at 22Mbps. I paused and ran a separate download test and got 768Mbps, so it's not the fault of the line. Is anyone else seeing better speeds?
I don't know whether they need to recode the app for multithreaded downloads (like Continuata) or just get a better hosting provider, but this is pathetic given the huge size of the libraries!
I agree. With one caveat...Post on release or when "real" info can be conveyed so we don't have 20 pages of speculation and wackamole mumbo jumbo before REAL discussions can begin! THIS got very old for me as time is precious these days. Mind you, I own nearly ALL Spitfire libraries but wading through a bunch of blather and speculation I did not enjoy although others might find it fun.As Spitfire posted in this thread just earlier today, I wouldn't go as far as to describe the situation as a "loss of Spitfire Audio here;" but I share your sentiment, sostenuto, that it would be great if they would ramp up their involvement at VI Control again.
Best,
Geoff
I'm in Coeur d'Alene Idaho on Spectrum and download speed is hovering between 44 and 51 Mbps here... Update: now down to 35 Mbps after a couple hours... only 33GBs downloaded so far...Oy!I'm seeing the same kind of speeds here in Portland. I've paused it and restarted, and seen it rise up to 50Mbps, but when I went back it was back to 20-22ish. Ugh!!!