I'm working on Counterpoint, and whilst following Fux and others I am writing lot's of CP, some handwritten and others in Musescore.
My current process is to complete the Cantus Firmus and then add CP above or below, attempting to adhere to the species constraints.
I would imagine at this point traditional students would submit these to their professor to have them marked/corrected.
As a self-studier I'm marking my own work (which whilst useful in and of itself) is not perfect.
I was looking online for any tools that would check my CP work, either by importing my MIDI/xml or even using a different notation tool.
Of course this is a very niche market however I have found a few:
Counterpointer 3 - Windows, £49 (no trial)
Artinfuser Editor - Online, Free/Options
Pizzicato - Windows, £??? (the site is.. umm.. retro.. and I gave up trying to find the pricing)
Has anyone used a tool like this? Am I missing an obvious one?
This actually looks like an obvious use case for a module/plugin for Musescore!!!!
**EDIT** As if by magic, Googling "Musescore counterpoint plugin" got me this
result and
this one
Well....
I just say two things: 1) I passed the entrance exam in music thery at Mozarteum (where ou write a fugue exposition=) after giving up from Fux and focusing on what my teacher said, who was organist. 2) I concluded my degree on first attempt without Fux in the whole study. In the final exam I had to write a 4 part fugue for a given subject, among other things. 3) I have a student that i teached at the conservatory, and now private, that does very well without Fux. You see the example below.
Can you improvise 1 to 1 counterpoint over this melody below getting the right clauses ? If not, I would focus more on this and on the skill of focusing more on what you want, what you CAN do, than what you are
not allowed to do (this is the consequence of the Fux method, no?)
The traditional students in their majority learned counterpoint very well in the paper, but their music is not relevant: you do´t know them. Few learned counterpoint in some way, that people want to hear them. For example: students of Nadja Boulanger (BOulez), and Marcel Dupre (Messiaen). In this case the teacher did not say what is wrong and right; or better said: even if it was said, this was NOT the point. The point was the
understanding of how the "engine" works".Historically and aesthetically. SO, for example, Diether De La Motte is the most influential music theorist of the last decades in Austria/Germany, and does not even mention Fux in his book, more than in one historical side note.
Schoenberg used the method of Fux in his book. Correct. But for this Schoenberg comes with 500 pages dedicated to understanding of the concept of musical logic. Is FUx then goo? It is in this sense; it is easy to get wrong with this method. I did. I did alone quite all Schoenberg exercises, in all clefs, before my first formal study in music (bachelor in piano performance) . Did this helped me ? Helped me to get bad habits.
If you need an app for this level of work, this means you need a teacher to give substance to your "self-taught feedback". If you don´t need the app, then it is probably a distraction. There is a lot in music " the classic way" still.
Just don´t be confused about this: the app in itself is awesome if it corrects according to Fux and you are learning music theory, principally if you are goingo to teach theory. IN this sense, I find interesting. But artistically, I suggest to do Fux in a more direct and relaxed way until 4 against 1 , or 3 part 1 to 1, and then learn in a different way, principally analysing JOsquin de Pres and Palestrina (if you like to be strict...be it...)
So, this is my opnion, as teacher of church music composition, choir conductor, and former titular organist ; ) If you need, just send some exercises to me on dm
* I have here mayn many exercises that the romantic composer Rheinberger wrote. They focus on techniques of counterpoint; not rules from Fux. They are just superficially similar to Fux approach ; they can be the same sometimes, but important is to understand the
musical frame of exercises, and that
we are in other historical time and needs. We have other pedagogy; sometimes the "archaic" or platonic pedagogy that maybe Fux missed , in his "enlightment". In my estimate, Fux is famous and got loved by schools because it makes easier to teach, organize, and punish. As a teacher , it is easier to teach by especies. Hard is to go in circles. BUt the artistical progress - altough it is not a vicious circle - it is an espiral ( if not a complex set of circular motions); you go back, you jump over one part, you repeat the same but faster, etc... So is the perfection.