What's new

Toontrack release new Decades SDX and Big Band EZX in collaboration with Al Schmitt

Is the normal Reverb channel (not the room reverb aux) a miked chamber (a la Les Paul), or a built-in effect? I simply didn't hear any difference, even with it at max, so wasn't sure if it's a "live channel" like any mic channel, or something that has to be routed to, by the drum mics.

Im pretty sure it was mentioned in the mixer walkthrough that that reverb channel was a feed into Al's favorite hardware reverb. Probably a Lex 224 or 480L.
 
Cool; thanks. And I think it isn't engaged on the drum kits I was working with last night, so I'll give it a listen on some of the other kits when I get past my Caribbean projects tonight or tomorrow.

This may finally be the drum library that gets me into mixing the drums in the drum software vs. the host DAW. :)
 


He starts talking about the Reverb channel around 2:01. As it is an algorithmic reverb (probably Lexicon), it doesn't sound like a room per se, so is probably meant more to help things glue together in the mix than to add or replace the natural ambience of the additional mics.

I also started listening to the Modern Jazz kit, and was astounded by how close it sounds to the drum kit used at Saturday's Diana Krall concert at Oakland's Fox Theatre, where I was in the fourth row (due to comp tickets -- my company ran the sound for the concert). Of course, she is listed as one of Al's clients. I'm looking forward to working with the 1930's kit as well.
 
I just spent another 90 minutes reviewing the mono "no-mix" one-at-a-time approach vs. stereo pre-mix, and am torn. Al's presets are the best I've ever heard for ANY drum library, as they sound very realistic and well-balanced, and probably would be OK in any song context, give or take some tweaks to the individual levels of some top kit pieces in the main drum view (vs. the mixer view).

I feel like I'm missing something by not taking advantage of his presets, so it may be time to switch to "mixing in the drum VI" and having just one stereo drum track in the host DAW. Certainly this saves time, and with his excellent yet subtle settings, the kit seems glued together and manageable, as the miking is so good that one doesn't really need post-processing.

Al's subtle application of room reverb to the top snare and the overhead pair is just enough, along with light Fairchild 678 compression/limiting on the output buss. I could also defeat that last stage and use my own 678 plug-ins without losing any of the stereo image or balance of Al's presets.

One of the things I am noticing with this kit, due to the excellent room miking, is that tracking each kit piece as a mono-summed independent track, is losing the movement within the overall space. With past libraries, I haven't felt anything was lost, when I compare results (vs. miking an actual kit and mixing it the traditional way), but it always nagged at me as the main potential drawback with my longstanding approach.

So I think now we have a library that is so perfectly miked and thought out, that it is "safe" to bounce just a single stereo combined track that is already balanced and minimally processed.

I do not know if the EZX Big Band library has the same mix settings as the SDX Decades library. The other, Toontrack presets, are too extreme for my tastes, as usual, but all of Al's hit the mark. Up until now, only a few presets have done that for me, and my recollection is that they were some of the artist presets for the new stock SD3's kits.

EDIT: After another half hour of mix comparisons, I have concluded that the built-in reverb is crucial, as it's the only place to properly add that light touch on the top snare and the OH mics, unless every single Toontrack channel is sent to its own DAW track (vs. each kit piece's combined signal). I ended up preferring the 670 not being on the internal mix buss though; I'll use my high-end processing plug-ins on the stereo drum bounce from Toontrack, in the DAW instead.
 
Last edited:
I just spent another 90 minutes reviewing the mono "no-mix" one-at-a-time approach vs. stereo pre-mix, and am torn. Al's presets are the best I've ever heard for ANY drum library, as they sound very realistic and well-balanced, and probably would be OK in any song context, give or take some tweaks to the individual levels of some top kit pieces in the main drum view (vs. the mixer view).

I feel like I'm missing something by not taking advantage of his presets, so it may be time to switch to "mixing in the drum VI" and having just one stereo drum track in the host DAW. Certainly this saves time, and with his excellent yet subtle settings, the kit seems glued together and manageable, as the miking is so good that one doesn't really need post-processing.

Al's subtle application of room reverb to the top snare and the overhead pair is just enough, along with light Fairchild 678 compression/limiting on the output buss. I could also defeat that last stage and use my own 678 plug-ins without losing any of the stereo image or balance of Al's presets.

One of the things I am noticing with this kit, due to the excellent room miking, is that tracking each kit piece as a mono-summed independent track, is losing the movement within the overall space. With past libraries, I haven't felt anything was lost, when I compare results (vs. miking an actual kit and mixing it the traditional way), but it always nagged at me as the main potential drawback with my longstanding approach.

So I think now we have a library that is so perfectly miked and thought out, that it is "safe" to bounce just a single stereo combined track that is already balanced and minimally processed.

I do not know if the EZX Big Band library has the same mix settings as the SDX Decades library. The other, Toontrack presets, are too extreme for my tastes, as usual, but all of Al's hit the mark. Up until now, only a few presets have done that for me, and my recollection is that they were some of the artist presets for the new stock SD3's kits.

EDIT: After another half hour of mix comparisons, I have concluded that the built-in reverb is crucial, as it's the only place to properly add that light touch on the top snare and the OH mics, unless every single Toontrack channel is sent to its own DAW track (vs. each kit piece's combined signal). I ended up preferring the 670 not being on the internal mix buss though; I'll use my high-end processing plug-ins on the stereo drum bounce from Toontrack, in the DAW instead.
Mark, I share your enthusiasm for this library. It seems to set itself apart from the other SDX expansion and core libraries and Al's presets and micing choices as well as the drum kit choices seem to be the difference. I also have fully embraced the internal SD3 mixer now (as opposed to assigning individual tracks in Daw) which may have been from watching the Decades videos but it offers plenty of processing options and saves real estate in the Cubase mixer. Definitely a great direction Toontrack went with this library.
 
I just spent the past three weeks finalizing the drums on every active project I have in the pool (and that means almost 100 pieces across many genres). Decades has now kicked to the curb, almost everything else I have been using; it's that great and wildly versatile.

What impresses me the most is that it's a natural sounding library that just sits in the mix perfectly as-is; especially when using Al Schmitt's presets as a starting point. Stuff that I've been struggling with for years, is no longer a barrier to finishing my productions. And by now, I have found at least one use for every single kit and variation available.

I am now exclusively using stereo full-kit outputs from Superior Drummer 3, greatly simplifying my projects and workflow from when I was treating VI drums like acoustic miked drums. I'm leaving the algorithmic reverb channel engaged as it is subtle and does help glue things together, so am only making three basic edits in most cases:
  1. Deletion of any compression on the master buss; this is end-of-chain and I have great plug-ins
  2. Drop the Spring and Plate Reverb Buss levels (usually I set to around -5.7 dB for most projects)
  3. Raise the Ride Cymbal by 9 dB and the Hi-Hats and other cymbals by 3 dB
This is in line with what I had already been doing with other SDX libraries, and I prefer to use lower velocity levels on my top kit (and even on the drums), so that the attacks are more natural and the overall dynamic range is more vital. Raising the instruments on the main page seems effective compared to mucking with the mic mix levels, as many SDX's capture the top kit mostly through OH's vs. spot mics anyway. Others may find that focusing on the mic mix levels is more effective for their work though.

I can't believe what a bargain this library is. And I think it's already won an award or two as the best drum library ever (well-deserved).
 
I can't believe what a bargain this library is.

I don't doubt it, but I'm still waiting for it to go on sale sometime later this year... so that it will even a greater "bargain". Once it does, I'll be snatching it up instantly.

Thanks for the update on your experience with the library. Encouraging.
 
Top Bottom